Volkswagen Fox 2005 vs Mitsubishi Colt 2005

 
Volkswagen Fox
2005 - 2011
Mitsubishi Colt
2005 - 2007
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 1.2 Petrol1.3 Petrol

Performance

Power: 55 HP95 HP
Torque: 106 NM125 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 18 seconds11 seconds
Mitsubishi Colt is a more dynamic driving.
Volkswagen Fox engine produces 40 HP less power than Mitsubishi Colt, whereas torque is 19 NM less than Mitsubishi Colt. Due to the lower power, Volkswagen Fox reaches 100 km/h speed 7 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 6.06.0
Fuel tank capacity: 50 litres47 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 830 km in combined cycle780 km in combined cycle
1000 km on highway940 km on highway
730 km with real consumption730 km with real consumption
Volkswagen Fox gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Dimensions

Length: 3.83 m3.81 m
Width: 1.66 m1.70 m
Height: 1.54 m1.52 m
Volkswagen Fox is 2 cm longer than the Mitsubishi Colt, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Volkswagen Fox is 2 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 260 litres155 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1016 litres760 litres
Volkswagen Fox has more luggage capacity.
Volkswagen Fox has 105 litres more trunk space than the Mitsubishi Colt. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Volkswagen Fox (by 256 litres).
Turning diameter: 11 meters10.8 meters
The turning circle of the Volkswagen Fox is 0.2 metres more than that of the Mitsubishi Colt.
Gross weight (kg): 1`4801`435
Safety:
Quality:
below average

high
Mitsubishi Colt has fewer problems.
According to annual technical inspection data Volkswagen Fox has serious deffects in 45 percent more cases than Mitsubishi Colt, so Mitsubishi Colt quality is probably significantly better
Average price (€): 20001600
Pros and Cons: Volkswagen Fox has
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • roomier boot
Mitsubishi Colt has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • fewer faults
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv