Volkswagen Fox 2005 vs Mitsubishi Colt 2005
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 1.2 Petrol | 1.3 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 55 HP | 95 HP | |
Torque: | 106 NM | 125 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 18 seconds | 11 seconds | |
Mitsubishi Colt is a more dynamic driving. Volkswagen Fox engine produces 40 HP less power than Mitsubishi Colt, whereas torque is 19 NM less than Mitsubishi Colt. Due to the lower power, Volkswagen Fox reaches 100 km/h speed 7 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.0 | 6.0 | |
Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 47 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 830 km in combined cycle | 780 km in combined cycle | |
1000 km on highway | 940 km on highway | ||
730 km with real consumption | 730 km with real consumption | ||
Volkswagen Fox gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 3.83 m | 3.81 m | |
Width: | 1.66 m | 1.70 m | |
Height: | 1.54 m | 1.52 m | |
Volkswagen Fox is 2 cm longer than the Mitsubishi Colt, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Volkswagen Fox is 2 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 260 litres | 155 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1016 litres | 760 litres | |
Volkswagen Fox has more luggage capacity. Volkswagen Fox has 105 litres more trunk space than the Mitsubishi Colt. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Volkswagen Fox (by 256 litres). | |||
Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 10.8 meters | |
The turning circle of the Volkswagen Fox is 0.2 metres more than that of the Mitsubishi Colt. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 1`480 | 1`435 | |
Safety: | |||
Quality: | below average | high | |
Mitsubishi Colt has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Volkswagen Fox has serious deffects in 45 percent more cases than Mitsubishi Colt, so Mitsubishi Colt quality is probably significantly better | |||
Average price (€): | 2000 | 1600 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Volkswagen Fox has
|
Mitsubishi Colt has
| |