Volkswagen EOS 2006 vs Volvo C70 2006
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.4 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 140 HP | 180 HP | |
| Torque: | 320 NM | 350 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.4 seconds | 9.5 seconds | |
|
Volvo C70 is a more dynamic driving. Volkswagen EOS engine produces 40 HP less power than Volvo C70, whereas torque is 30 NM less than Volvo C70. Due to the lower power, Volkswagen EOS reaches 100 km/h speed 0.9 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.1 | 7.3 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.2 l/100km | 7.2 l/100km | |
|
The Volkswagen EOS is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Volkswagen EOS consumes 1.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo C70, which means that by driving the Volkswagen EOS over 15,000 km in a year you can save 180 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Volkswagen EOS consumes 1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo C70. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 62 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 900 km in combined cycle | 840 km in combined cycle | |
| 1100 km on highway | 1060 km on highway | ||
| 880 km with real consumption | 860 km with real consumption | ||
| Volkswagen EOS gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.41 m | 4.58 m | |
| Width: | 1.79 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.44 m | 1.40 m | |
|
Volkswagen EOS is smaller, but slightly higher. Volkswagen EOS is 17 cm shorter than the Volvo C70, 3 cm narrower, while the height of Volkswagen EOS is 4 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 205 litres | 200 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
380 litres | 404 litres | |
| Volkswagen EOS has 5 litres more trunk space than the Volvo C70. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Volvo C70 (by 24 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.9 meters | 12.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Volkswagen EOS is 1.8 metres less than that of the Volvo C70, which means Volkswagen EOS can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`010 | 2`090 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | above average | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 5000 | 5000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volkswagen EOS has
|
Volvo C70 has
| |