Volkswagen EOS 2006 vs Volvo C70 2009
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 140 HP | 136 HP | |
| Torque: | 320 NM | 320 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.4 seconds | 11 seconds | |
|
Volkswagen EOS is more dynamic to drive. Volkswagen EOS engine produces 4 HP more power than Volvo C70, the torque is the same for both cars. Thanks to more power Volkswagen EOS reaches 100 km/h speed 0.6 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.1 | 6.3 | |
| Volkswagen EOS consumes 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo C70, which means that by driving the Volkswagen EOS over 15,000 km in a year you can save 30 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 52 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 900 km in combined cycle | 820 km in combined cycle | |
| 1100 km on highway | 980 km on highway | ||
| Volkswagen EOS gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.41 m | 4.62 m | |
| Width: | 1.79 m | 1.84 m | |
| Height: | 1.44 m | 1.40 m | |
|
Volkswagen EOS is smaller, but slightly higher. Volkswagen EOS is 21 cm shorter than the Volvo C70, 5 cm narrower, while the height of Volkswagen EOS is 4 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 205 litres | 200 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
380 litres | no data | |
| Volkswagen EOS has 5 litres more trunk space than the Volvo C70. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.9 meters | 11.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Volkswagen EOS is 0.9 metres less than that of the Volvo C70, which means Volkswagen EOS can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`010 | 2`130 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | above average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 5000 | 9600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volkswagen EOS has
|
| |