Volkswagen EOS 2011 vs Mitsubishi Colt 2007
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 1.5 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 210 HP | 109 HP | |
| Torque: | 280 NM | 145 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.8 seconds | 10.5 seconds | |
|
Volkswagen EOS is more dynamic to drive. Volkswagen EOS engine produces 101 HP more power than Mitsubishi Colt, whereas torque is 135 NM more than Mitsubishi Colt. Thanks to more power Volkswagen EOS reaches 100 km/h speed 2.7 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.1 | 6.6 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.2 l/100km | 7.0 l/100km | |
|
The Mitsubishi Colt is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Volkswagen EOS consumes 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Colt, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Volkswagen EOS could require 75 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Volkswagen EOS consumes 1.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Colt. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 47 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 770 km in combined cycle | 710 km in combined cycle | |
| 1010 km on highway | 870 km on highway | ||
| 670 km with real consumption | 670 km with real consumption | ||
| Volkswagen EOS gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.42 m | 3.88 m | |
| Width: | 1.79 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.44 m | 1.45 m | |
|
Volkswagen EOS is larger, but slightly lower. Volkswagen EOS is 55 cm longer than the Mitsubishi Colt, 10 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 205 litres | 190 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
380 litres | no data | |
| Volkswagen EOS has 15 litres more trunk space than the Mitsubishi Colt. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.9 meters | 10.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Volkswagen EOS is 0.1 metres more than that of the Mitsubishi Colt. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`000 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | above average | above average | |
| Volkswagen EOS has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Mitsubishi Colt has serious deffects in 115 percent more cases than Volkswagen EOS, so Volkswagen EOS quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 6400 | 3000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volkswagen EOS has
|
Mitsubishi Colt has
| |