Volkswagen EOS 2011 vs Mercedes SLK 2011
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 1.8 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 210 HP | 184 HP | |
| Torque: | 280 NM | 270 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.8 seconds | 7.3 seconds | |
| Volkswagen EOS engine produces 26 HP more power than Mercedes SLK, whereas torque is 10 NM more than Mercedes SLK. Despite the higher power, Volkswagen EOS reaches 100 km/h speed 0.5 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.1 | 6.4 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.2 l/100km | 7.8 l/100km | |
|
The Mercedes SLK is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Volkswagen EOS consumes 0.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mercedes SLK, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Volkswagen EOS could require 105 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Volkswagen EOS consumes 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mercedes SLK. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 770 km in combined cycle | 930 km in combined cycle | |
| 1010 km on highway | 1200 km on highway | ||
| 670 km with real consumption | 760 km with real consumption | ||
| Mercedes SLK gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | |
| Front-wheel drive cars (Volkswagen EOS) have better traction on slippery roads and when climbing hills, better fuel economy, and are less expensive to purchase. On the disadvantage side, FWD cars usually have less towing capacity, poorer acceleration and harder handling. Rear-wheel drive cars (Mercedes SLK) have better handling on dry roads, better acceleration, more even weight distribution and more fun to drive. RWD is also better for towing large loads. The cons of rear-wheel drive are less interior and trunk space and more difficulty maneuvering in wet and snowy conditions. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.42 m | 4.14 m | |
| Width: | 1.79 m | 1.81 m | |
| Height: | 1.44 m | 1.30 m | |
| Volkswagen EOS is 28 cm longer than the Mercedes SLK, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Volkswagen EOS is 14 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 205 litres | 225 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
380 litres | 335 litres | |
| Despite its longer length, This could mean that the Volkswagen EOS uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Volkswagen EOS (by 45 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.9 meters | 10.5 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Volkswagen EOS is 0.4 metres more than that of the Mercedes SLK, which means Volkswagen EOS can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | 2`000 kg | 1`750 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`563 kg | 1`435 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 437 kg | 315 kg | |
| Volkswagen EOS load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 28 procentiem more than Mercedes SLK. Therefore, Volkswagen EOS is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | above average | high | |
| Mercedes SLK has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Volkswagen EOS has serious deffects in 85 percent more cases than Mercedes SLK, so Mercedes SLK quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 7600 | 17 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volkswagen EOS has
|
Mercedes SLK has
| |