Volkswagen EOS 2006 vs Mercedes CLK 2005
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | |
| Volkswagen EOS is available with front wheel drive, while Mercedes CLK can be equipped with rear wheel drive. | |||
| Engines: | 1.4 - 3.6 | 1.8 - 6.2 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 116 - 260 HP | 163 - 481 HP | |
| Torque: | 155 - 350 NM | 240 - 630 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 6.9 - 11.9 seconds | 4.7 - 10.5 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.1 - 9.2 | 7.5 - 14.4 | |
|
Volkswagen EOS petrol engines consumes on average 2.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than Mercedes CLK. On average, Volkswagen EOS equipped with diesel engines consume 1.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mercedes CLK. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.41 m | 4.65 m | |
| Width: | 1.79 m | 1.74 m | |
| Height: | 1.44 m | 1.42 m | |
| Volkswagen EOS is 24 cm shorter than the Mercedes CLK, 5 cm wider, while the height of Volkswagen EOS is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 205 litres | 390 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
380 litres | no data | |
|
Mercedes CLK has more luggage space. Volkswagen EOS has 185 litres less trunk space than the Mercedes CLK. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.9 meters | 10.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Volkswagen EOS is 0.1 metres more than that of the Mercedes CLK. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`980 | ~ 2`182 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | above average | average | |
| Average price (€): | 5600 | 7200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volkswagen EOS has
|
Mercedes CLK has
| |