Volkswagen EOS 2011 vs Audi A3 2013
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Volkswagen EOS is available only with front wheel drive, while Audi A3 can be equipped with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive. | |||
Engines: | 1.4 - 2.0 | 1.4 - 2.0 | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 122 - 210 HP | 110 - 184 HP | |
Torque: | 200 - 320 NM | 200 - 380 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.8 - 10.9 seconds | 7.6 - 11.4 seconds | |
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.8 - 7.5 | 3.9 - 6.6 | |
Volkswagen EOS petrol engines consumes on average 1.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than Audi A3. On average, Volkswagen EOS equipped with diesel engines consume 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Audi A3. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.42 m | 4.42 m | |
Width: | 1.79 m | 1.79 m | |
Height: | 1.44 m | 1.41 m | |
Both cars are similar in size. Volkswagen EOS and Audi A3 are practically the same length. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 205 litres | 320 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
380 litres | 678 litres | |
Audi A3 has more luggage space. Volkswagen EOS has 115 litres less trunk space than the Audi A3. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Audi A3 (by 298 litres). | |||
Turning diameter: | 10.9 meters | 10.9 meters | |
Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`978 | ~ 1`936 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | above average | high | |
Average price (€): | 6400 | no data | |
Pros and Cons: |
|
Audi A3 has
| |