Volkswagen EOS 2011 vs Audi A3 2013

Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison

 
Volkswagen EOS
2011 - 2015
Audi A3
2013 - 2016
Gearbox: Manual/AutomaticManual/Automatic
Wheel drive type: Front wheel drive (FWD)Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)
Volkswagen EOS is available only with front wheel drive, while Audi A3 can be equipped with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive.
Engines: 1.4 - 2.01.4 - 2.0

Performance

Power: 122 - 210 HP110 - 184 HP
Torque: 200 - 320 NM200 - 380 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 7.8 - 10.9 seconds7.6 - 11.4 seconds
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison!

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 4.8 - 7.53.9 - 6.6
Volkswagen EOS petrol engines consumes on average 1.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than Audi A3. On average, Volkswagen EOS equipped with diesel engines consume 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Audi A3.
This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version!

Dimensions

Length: 4.42 m4.42 m
Width: 1.79 m1.79 m
Height: 1.44 m1.41 m
Both cars are similar in size. Volkswagen EOS and Audi A3 are practically the same length.
Trunk capacity: 205 litres320 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
380 litres678 litres
Audi A3 has more luggage space.
Volkswagen EOS has 115 litres less trunk space than the Audi A3. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Audi A3 (by 298 litres).
Turning diameter: 10.9 meters10.9 meters
Gross weight (kg): ~ 1`978~ 1`936
Safety: no datano data
Quality:
above average

high
Average price (€): 11 600no data
Pros and Cons:
    Audi A3 has
    • available with 4x4 drive
    • lower fuel consumption
    • roomier boot
    • fewer faults
    Share these results to social networks or e-mail
    Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv