Volkswagen EOS 2011 vs Volvo C70 2009
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.4 - 2.0 | 2.0 - 2.5 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 122 - 210 HP | 136 - 220 HP | |
| Torque: | 200 - 320 NM | 220 - 400 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.8 - 10.9 seconds | 7.6 - 11.8 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.8 - 7.5 | 5.9 - 9.6 | |
|
Volkswagen EOS petrol engines consumes on average 2.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than Volvo C70. On average, Volkswagen EOS equipped with diesel engines consume 1.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo C70. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.42 m | 4.62 m | |
| Width: | 1.79 m | 1.84 m | |
| Height: | 1.44 m | 1.40 m | |
|
Volkswagen EOS is smaller, but higher. Volkswagen EOS is 19 cm shorter than the Volvo C70, 5 cm narrower, while the height of Volkswagen EOS is 4 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 205 litres | 404 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
380 litres | no data | |
|
Volvo C70 has more luggage space. Volkswagen EOS has 199 litres less trunk space than the Volvo C70. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.9 meters | 12 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Volkswagen EOS is 1.1 metres less than that of the Volvo C70, which means Volkswagen EOS can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`978 | ~ 2`108 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | above average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 6400 | 9600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volkswagen EOS has
|
Volvo C70 has
| |