Volkswagen EOS 2011 vs Mitsubishi Colt 2007
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Volkswagen EOS is available with both manual and automatic gearboxes, whereas Mitsubishi Colt is available only with manual gearbox. | |||
| Engines: | 1.4 - 2.0 (petrol, diesel) | 1.5 (petrol) | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 122 - 210 HP | 109 - 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 200 - 320 NM | 145 - 210 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.8 - 10.9 seconds | 8.4 - 10.5 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.8 - 7.5 | 6.6 - 7.1 | |
|
Volkswagen EOS petrol engines consumes on average 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than Mitsubishi Colt. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.42 m | 3.88 m | |
| Width: | 1.79 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.44 m | 1.46 m | |
|
Volkswagen EOS is larger, but slightly lower. Volkswagen EOS is 54 cm longer than the Mitsubishi Colt, 10 cm wider, while the height of Volkswagen EOS is 1 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 205 litres | 190 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
380 litres | no data | |
| Volkswagen EOS has 15 litres more trunk space than the Mitsubishi Colt. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.9 meters | 10.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Volkswagen EOS is 0.1 metres more than that of the Mitsubishi Colt. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`978 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | above average | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 6400 | 3000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volkswagen EOS has
|
Mitsubishi Colt has
| |