Volkswagen EOS 2011 vs Audi TT 2010
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Volkswagen EOS is available only with front wheel drive, while Audi TT can be equipped with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive. | |||
Engines: | 1.4 - 2.0 | 1.8 - 2.5 | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 122 - 210 HP | 160 - 360 HP | |
Torque: | 200 - 320 NM | 250 - 465 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.8 - 10.9 seconds | 4.4 - 7.7 seconds | |
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.8 - 7.5 | 5.5 - 9.5 | |
Volkswagen EOS petrol engines consumes on average 0.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than Audi TT. On average, Volkswagen EOS equipped with diesel engines consume 0.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Audi TT. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.42 m | 4.19 m | |
Width: | 1.79 m | 1.84 m | |
Height: | 1.44 m | 1.36 m | |
Volkswagen EOS is 23 cm longer than the Audi TT, 5 cm narrower, while the height of Volkswagen EOS is 9 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 205 litres | 250 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
380 litres | no data | |
Audi TT has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Volkswagen EOS has 45 litres less trunk space than the Audi TT. This could mean that the Volkswagen EOS uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
Turning diameter: | 10.9 meters | 10.9 meters | |
Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`978 | ~ 1`712 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | above average | high | |
Average price (€): | 11 600 | no data | |
Pros and Cons: |
Volkswagen EOS has
|
Audi TT has
| |