Volkswagen Caddy 2004 vs Ford Tourneo 2010
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 1.8 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 69 HP | 90 HP | |
Torque: | 140 NM | 220 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 20.5 seconds | 15.2 seconds | |
Ford Tourneo is a more dynamic driving. Volkswagen Caddy engine produces 21 HP less power than Ford Tourneo, whereas torque is 80 NM less than Ford Tourneo. Due to the lower power, Volkswagen Caddy reaches 100 km/h speed 5.3 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.5 | 6.4 | |
Real fuel consumption: | 6.9 l/100km | 7.0 l/100km | |
By specification Volkswagen Caddy consumes 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford Tourneo, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Volkswagen Caddy could require 15 litres more fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Volkswagen Caddy consumes 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford Tourneo. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 60 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 920 km in combined cycle | 930 km in combined cycle | |
1070 km on highway | 1090 km on highway | ||
860 km with real consumption | 850 km with real consumption | ||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.40 m | 4.57 m | |
Width: | 1.80 m | 1.80 m | |
Height: | 1.83 m | 1.98 m | |
Volkswagen Caddy is 17 cm shorter than the Ford Tourneo, width is practically the same , while the height of Volkswagen Caddy is 15 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 560 litres | no data | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
2239 litres | no data | |
Turning diameter: | 11.3 meters | 11.9 meters | |
The turning circle of the Volkswagen Caddy is 0.6 metres less than that of the Ford Tourneo, which means Volkswagen Caddy can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 2`000 | 2`330 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | average | no data | |
Average price (€): | 2600 | 5600 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Volkswagen Caddy has
|
Ford Tourneo has
| |