Volkswagen Caddy 2006 vs Volkswagen Sharan 2005
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 109 HP | 140 HP | |
| Torque: | 160 NM | 310 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 12.8 seconds | |
| Volkswagen Caddy engine produces 31 HP less power than Volkswagen Sharan, whereas torque is 150 NM less than Volkswagen Sharan. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | no data | 6.2 | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 70 litres | |
| 830 km with real consumption | 920 km with real consumption | ||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.40 m | 4.63 m | |
| Width: | 1.80 m | 1.81 m | |
| Height: | 1.83 m | 1.73 m | |
|
Volkswagen Caddy is smaller, but higher. Volkswagen Caddy is 23 cm shorter than the Volkswagen Sharan, 1 cm narrower, while the height of Volkswagen Caddy is 10 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 560 litres | 256 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
2239 litres | no data | |
|
Volkswagen Caddy has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Volkswagen Caddy has 304 litres more trunk space than the Volkswagen Sharan. The Volkswagen Sharan may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.3 meters | 10.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Volkswagen Caddy is 0.4 metres more than that of the Volkswagen Sharan, which means Volkswagen Caddy can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`000 | 2`000 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | average | average | |
| Volkswagen Caddy has slightly fewer faults. Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Volkswagen Sharan, so Volkswagen Caddy quality could be a bit better. | |||
| Average price (€): | 3000 | 2600 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 7.8/10 | 6.1/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volkswagen Caddy has
|
Volkswagen Sharan has
| |