Volkswagen Caddy 2006 vs Volkswagen Sharan 2000
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.9 Diesel | 1.9 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 105 HP | 115 HP | |
| Torque: | 250 NM | 310 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 15.1 seconds | |
| Volkswagen Caddy engine produces 10 HP less power than Volkswagen Sharan, whereas torque is 60 NM less than Volkswagen Sharan. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | no data | 7.2 | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 70 litres | |
| 830 km with real consumption | 900 km with real consumption | ||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.40 m | 4.63 m | |
| Width: | 1.80 m | 1.81 m | |
| Height: | 1.83 m | 1.73 m | |
|
Volkswagen Caddy is smaller, but higher. Volkswagen Caddy is 23 cm shorter than the Volkswagen Sharan, 1 cm narrower, while the height of Volkswagen Caddy is 10 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 560 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
2239 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.3 meters | 10.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Volkswagen Caddy is 0.4 metres more than that of the Volkswagen Sharan, which means Volkswagen Caddy can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`000 | 2`000 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | average | average | |
| Volkswagen Caddy has slightly fewer faults. Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Volkswagen Sharan, so Volkswagen Caddy quality could be a bit better. | |||
| Average price (€): | 3000 | 2600 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 7.8/10 | 6.1/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volkswagen Caddy has
|
Volkswagen Sharan has
| |