Volkswagen Caddy 2004 vs Ford Tourneo 2010
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 1.9 Diesel | 1.8 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 105 HP | 90 HP | |
Torque: | 250 NM | 220 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.3 seconds | 15.2 seconds | |
Volkswagen Caddy is more dynamic to drive. Volkswagen Caddy engine produces 15 HP more power than Ford Tourneo, whereas torque is 30 NM more than Ford Tourneo. Thanks to more power Volkswagen Caddy reaches 100 km/h speed 1.9 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.0 | 6.4 | |
Real fuel consumption: | 7.0 l/100km | 7.0 l/100km | |
The Volkswagen Caddy is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Volkswagen Caddy consumes 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford Tourneo, which means that by driving the Volkswagen Caddy over 15,000 km in a year you can save 60 litres of fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 60 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 1000 km in combined cycle | 930 km in combined cycle | |
1150 km on highway | 1090 km on highway | ||
850 km with real consumption | 850 km with real consumption | ||
Volkswagen Caddy gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.40 m | 4.57 m | |
Width: | 1.80 m | 1.80 m | |
Height: | 1.83 m | 1.98 m | |
Volkswagen Caddy is 17 cm shorter than the Ford Tourneo, width is practically the same , while the height of Volkswagen Caddy is 15 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 560 litres | no data | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
2239 litres | no data | |
Turning diameter: | 11.3 meters | 11.9 meters | |
The turning circle of the Volkswagen Caddy is 0.6 metres less than that of the Ford Tourneo, which means Volkswagen Caddy can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 2`000 | 2`330 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | average | no data | |
Average price (€): | 2600 | 5600 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Volkswagen Caddy has
|
| |