Volkswagen Caddy 2004 vs Ford C-Max 2007
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.9 Diesel | 1.6 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 105 HP | 90 HP | |
| Torque: | 250 NM | 215 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.3 seconds | 13.1 seconds | |
| Volkswagen Caddy engine produces 15 HP more power than Ford C-Max, whereas torque is 35 NM more than Ford C-Max. Despite the higher power, Volkswagen Caddy reaches 100 km/h speed 0.2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.0 | 4.8 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.0 l/100km | 5.6 l/100km | |
|
The Ford C-Max is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Volkswagen Caddy consumes 1.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford C-Max, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Volkswagen Caddy could require 180 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Volkswagen Caddy consumes 1.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford C-Max. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1000 km in combined cycle | 1140 km in combined cycle | |
| 850 km with real consumption | 980 km with real consumption | ||
| Ford C-Max gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.40 m | 4.33 m | |
| Width: | 1.80 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.83 m | 1.60 m | |
| Volkswagen Caddy is 7 cm longer than the Ford C-Max, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Volkswagen Caddy is 23 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 560 litres | 550 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
2239 litres | 1620 litres | |
| Volkswagen Caddy has 10 litres more trunk space than the Ford C-Max. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Volkswagen Caddy (by 619 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.3 meters | 10.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Volkswagen Caddy is 0.6 metres more than that of the Ford C-Max, which means Volkswagen Caddy can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`000 | 1`920 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | average | high | |
| Ford C-Max has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Volkswagen Caddy has serious deffects in 25 percent more cases than Ford C-Max, so Ford C-Max quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 2600 | 2200 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 7.8/10 | 4.8/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volkswagen Caddy has
|
Ford C-Max has
| |