Volkswagen Caddy 2006 vs Volkswagen Sharan 2000
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.4 Petrol | 1.8 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 80 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 132 NM | 210 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 16.6 seconds | 10.9 seconds | |
|
Volkswagen Sharan is a more dynamic driving. Volkswagen Caddy engine produces 70 HP less power than Volkswagen Sharan, whereas torque is 78 NM less than Volkswagen Sharan. Due to the lower power, Volkswagen Caddy reaches 100 km/h speed 5.7 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.3 | 9.4 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.4 l/100km | 10.1 l/100km | |
|
The Volkswagen Caddy is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Volkswagen Caddy consumes 1.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Sharan, which means that by driving the Volkswagen Caddy over 15,000 km in a year you can save 165 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Volkswagen Caddy consumes 1.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Sharan. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 720 km in combined cycle | 740 km in combined cycle | |
| 890 km on highway | 950 km on highway | ||
| 710 km with real consumption | 690 km with real consumption | ||
| Volkswagen Sharan 2000 1.8 engine: The weakest link in this engine is the turbine, whose failure is contributed to by a faulty catalytic converter. The oil pump and chain tensioner also tend to have problems. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.40 m | 4.63 m | |
| Width: | 1.80 m | 1.81 m | |
| Height: | 1.83 m | 1.73 m | |
|
Volkswagen Caddy is smaller, but higher. Volkswagen Caddy is 23 cm shorter than the Volkswagen Sharan, 1 cm narrower, while the height of Volkswagen Caddy is 10 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 560 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
2239 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.3 meters | 10.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Volkswagen Caddy is 0.4 metres more than that of the Volkswagen Sharan, which means Volkswagen Caddy can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`160 | 1`900 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | average | average | |
| Volkswagen Caddy has slightly fewer faults. Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Volkswagen Sharan, so Volkswagen Caddy quality could be a bit better. | |||
| Average price (€): | 2600 | 2200 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 7.8/10 | 6.1/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volkswagen Caddy has
|
Volkswagen Sharan has
| |