Volkswagen Caddy 2004 vs Ford Tourneo 2002
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.4 Petrol | 1.8 Diesel | |
| Petrol engines (Volkswagen Caddy) are generally quieter, smoother, and better suited for short trips due to quicker warm-up times. Diesel (Ford Tourneo) engines, on the other hand, offer superior fuel efficiency and torque, making them ideal for long-distance driving and heavy loads. Read more: Petrol vs. Diesel: Fuel Economy and Key Differences. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 75 HP | 90 HP | |
| Torque: | 126 NM | 220 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 17.9 seconds | 15.2 seconds | |
|
Ford Tourneo is a more dynamic driving. Volkswagen Caddy engine produces 15 HP less power than Ford Tourneo, whereas torque is 94 NM less than Ford Tourneo. Due to the lower power, Volkswagen Caddy reaches 100 km/h speed 2.7 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.2 | 6.4 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.9 l/100km | 7.0 l/100km | |
|
The Ford Tourneo is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Volkswagen Caddy consumes 1.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford Tourneo, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Volkswagen Caddy could require 270 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Volkswagen Caddy consumes 1.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford Tourneo. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 730 km in combined cycle | 930 km in combined cycle | |
| 860 km on highway | 1090 km on highway | ||
| 670 km with real consumption | 850 km with real consumption | ||
| Ford Tourneo gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Volkswagen Caddy 2004 1.4 engine: Engine is known for its simplicity, compact design, and overall reliability. Many complaints from owners are related to power loss or fluctuating idle, often caused by issues with the throttle body, EGR valve, or air leaks ... More about Volkswagen Caddy 2004 1.4 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.40 m | 4.57 m | |
| Width: | 1.80 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.83 m | 1.98 m | |
| Volkswagen Caddy is 17 cm shorter than the Ford Tourneo, width is practically the same , while the height of Volkswagen Caddy is 15 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 560 litres | 1400 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
2239 litres | 3500 litres | |
|
Ford Tourneo has more luggage space. Volkswagen Caddy has 840 litres less trunk space than the Ford Tourneo. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Ford Tourneo (by 1261 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.3 meters | 11.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Volkswagen Caddy is 0.6 metres less than that of the Ford Tourneo, which means Volkswagen Caddy can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Power steering: | Electric power steering | Hydraulic power steering | |
| Electric power steering is simpler, quieter, more fuel-efficient, more configurable and provides additional features such as auto-steering for lane assist and parking. The disadvantages of electric power steering are possible overheating under prolonged load conditions and insufficient feedback (feeling) during steering. | |||
| Gross weight: | 2`000 kg | 2`330 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`446 kg | 1`545 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 554 kg | 785 kg | |
| Volkswagen Caddy load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 42 procentiem less than Ford Tourneo. Therefore, Ford Tourneo is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 2800 | 4400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volkswagen Caddy has
|
Ford Tourneo has
| |