Volkswagen Caddy 2010 vs Volkswagen Touran 2010
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 110 HP | 140 HP | |
| Torque: | 280 NM | 320 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.8 seconds | 9.9 seconds | |
|
Volkswagen Touran is a more dynamic driving. Volkswagen Caddy engine produces 30 HP less power than Volkswagen Touran, whereas torque is 40 NM less than Volkswagen Touran. Due to the lower power, Volkswagen Caddy reaches 100 km/h speed 2.9 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.5 | 5.3 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.5 l/100km | 6.3 l/100km | |
|
The Volkswagen Touran is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Volkswagen Caddy consumes 1.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Touran, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Volkswagen Caddy could require 180 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Volkswagen Caddy consumes 1.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Touran. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 920 km in combined cycle | 1130 km in combined cycle | |
| 1050 km on highway | 1300 km on highway | ||
| 800 km with real consumption | 950 km with real consumption | ||
| Volkswagen Touran gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
| Ground clearance: | 159 mm (6.3 inches) | 140 mm (5.5 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Volkswagen Caddy can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
| Volkswagen Touran 2010 2.0 engine: The engine is very durable and can last a long time with proper maintenance, and is also quite economical for its power. There may be some problems with the turbine geometry. It is important to use good ... More about Volkswagen Touran 2010 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.41 m | 4.40 m | |
| Width: | 1.79 m | 1.79 m | |
| Height: | 1.86 m | 1.67 m | |
| Volkswagen Caddy and Volkswagen Touran are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 560 litres | 695 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
3200 litres | 1989 litres | |
| Volkswagen Caddy has 135 litres less trunk space than the Volkswagen Touran. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Volkswagen Caddy (by 1211 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.1 meters | 11.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Volkswagen Caddy is 0.1 metres less than that of the Volkswagen Touran. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`280 | 2`190 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Volkswagen Touran scores higher in safety tests. The Volkswagen Touran scores higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | below average | below average | |
| Volkswagen Touran has slightly fewer faults. Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Volkswagen Caddy, so Volkswagen Touran quality could be a bit better. | |||
| Average price (€): | 5400 | 6400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volkswagen Caddy has
|
Volkswagen Touran has
| |