Volkswagen Caddy 2010 vs Ford Galaxy 2006
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 110 HP | 140 HP | |
| Torque: | 280 NM | 320 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.8 seconds | 10.5 seconds | |
|
Ford Galaxy is a more dynamic driving. Volkswagen Caddy engine produces 30 HP less power than Ford Galaxy, whereas torque is 40 NM less than Ford Galaxy. Due to the lower power, Volkswagen Caddy reaches 100 km/h speed 2.3 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.5 | 6.5 | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 920 km in combined cycle | 1070 km in combined cycle | |
| 1050 km on highway | 1270 km on highway | ||
| 800 km with real consumption | 970 km with real consumption | ||
| Ford Galaxy gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
| Ford Galaxy 2006 2.0 engine: In early production engines, the camshaft timing chain often stretched, requiring timely replacement to avoid potential issues. The fuel system, equipped with piezo injectors, is highly sensitive to fuel ... More about Ford Galaxy 2006 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.41 m | 4.82 m | |
| Width: | 1.79 m | 1.85 m | |
| Height: | 1.86 m | 1.72 m | |
|
Volkswagen Caddy is smaller, but higher. Volkswagen Caddy is 41 cm shorter than the Ford Galaxy, 6 cm narrower, while the height of Volkswagen Caddy is 14 cm higher. | |||
| Seats: | no data | 7 seats | |
| Trunk capacity: | 560 litres | 308 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | no data | 308 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | 560 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
3200 litres | 2325 litres | |
| The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Volkswagen Caddy (by 875 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.1 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight: | 2`280 kg | 2`505 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`576 kg | 1`735 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 704 kg | 770 kg | |
| Volkswagen Caddy load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 9 procentiem less than Ford Galaxy. Therefore, Ford Galaxy is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | average | low | |
| Volkswagen Caddy has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Ford Galaxy has serious deffects in 30 percent more cases than Volkswagen Caddy, so Volkswagen Caddy quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 5200 | 3200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volkswagen Caddy has
|
Ford Galaxy has
| |