Volkswagen Caddy 2010 vs Nissan Evalia (NV200) 2011
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 1.5 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 140 HP | 90 HP | |
| Torque: | 320 NM | 200 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.5 seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Volkswagen Caddy engine produces 50 HP more power than Nissan Evalia (NV200), whereas torque is 120 NM more than Nissan Evalia (NV200). | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.0 | 5.3 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.9 l/100km | 6.1 l/100km | |
|
The Nissan Evalia (NV200) is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Volkswagen Caddy consumes 0.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Evalia (NV200), which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Volkswagen Caddy could require 105 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Volkswagen Caddy consumes 0.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Evalia (NV200). | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1000 km in combined cycle | 1130 km in combined cycle | |
| 1170 km on highway | 1220 km on highway | ||
| 860 km with real consumption | 980 km with real consumption | ||
| Nissan Evalia (NV200) gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 8 years | 8 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 12 other car models, including Volkswagen Passat, Volkswagen Golf, Volkswagen Sharan, Audi A3 | Installed on at least 22 other car models, including Nissan Qashqai, Renault Laguna, Renault Scenic, Dacia Duster, Nissan Juke | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Nissan Evalia (NV200) might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
| The Volkswagen Caddy engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
| Volkswagen Caddy 2010 2.0 engine: The engine is very durable and can last a long time with proper maintenance, and is also quite economical for its power. There may be some problems with the turbine geometry. It is important to use good ... More about Volkswagen Caddy 2010 2.0 engine Nissan Evalia (NV200) 2011 1.5 engine: The engine has many modifications, is sufficiently common and spare parts are available. The fuel consumption/power ratio is good. The fuel injection system can be a problem and the timing belt change interval ... More about Nissan Evalia (NV200) 2011 1.5 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.41 m | 4.40 m | |
| Width: | 1.79 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.86 m | 1.86 m | |
|
Volkswagen Caddy is larger, but slightly lower. Volkswagen Caddy and Nissan Evalia (NV200) are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 560 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
3200 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.1 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Volkswagen Caddy is 0.5 metres more than that of the Nissan Evalia (NV200), which means Volkswagen Caddy can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`172 | 2`030 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 5400 | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volkswagen Caddy has
|
Nissan Evalia (NV200) has
| |