Volkswagen Caddy 2010 vs Citroen C4 Picasso 2010
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Diesel | 1.6 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 75 HP | 112 HP | |
| Torque: | 225 NM | 270 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 17.6 seconds | 12.8 seconds | |
|
Citroen C4 Picasso is a more dynamic driving. Volkswagen Caddy engine produces 37 HP less power than Citroen C4 Picasso, whereas torque is 45 NM less than Citroen C4 Picasso. Due to the lower power, Volkswagen Caddy reaches 100 km/h speed 4.8 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.3 | 5.2 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.5 l/100km | 6.1 l/100km | |
|
The Citroen C4 Picasso is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Volkswagen Caddy consumes 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Citroen C4 Picasso, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Volkswagen Caddy could require 15 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Volkswagen Caddy consumes 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Citroen C4 Picasso. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1130 km in combined cycle | 1150 km in combined cycle | |
| 1220 km on highway | 1330 km on highway | ||
| 920 km with real consumption | 980 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Volkswagen Caddy 2010 1.6 engine: The 1.6 TDI turbo diesel engine is generally reliable, which is especially reassuring given its frequent use in commercial vehicles. Even under heavy use, it can exceed 500,000 km, provided that maintenance is performed regularly and ... More about Volkswagen Caddy 2010 1.6 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.41 m | 4.47 m | |
| Width: | 1.79 m | 1.83 m | |
| Height: | 1.86 m | 1.68 m | |
|
Volkswagen Caddy is smaller, but higher. Volkswagen Caddy is 6 cm shorter than the Citroen C4 Picasso, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Volkswagen Caddy is 18 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 560 litres | 500 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
3200 litres | 1734 litres | |
|
Volkswagen Caddy has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Volkswagen Caddy has 60 litres more trunk space than the Citroen C4 Picasso. The Citroen C4 Picasso may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Volkswagen Caddy (by 1466 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.1 meters | 11.3 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Volkswagen Caddy is 0.2 metres less than that of the Citroen C4 Picasso. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`159 | 2`050 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | average | low | |
| Volkswagen Caddy has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Citroen C4 Picasso has serious deffects in 35 percent more cases than Volkswagen Caddy, so Volkswagen Caddy quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 5200 | 3200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volkswagen Caddy has
|
Citroen C4 Picasso has
| |