Volkswagen Caddy 2010 vs Toyota Verso 2013
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain | |
| Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 102 HP | 126 HP | |
| Torque: | 250 NM | 310 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.9 seconds | 11.3 seconds | |
|
Toyota Verso is a more dynamic driving. Volkswagen Caddy engine produces 24 HP less power than Toyota Verso, whereas torque is 60 NM less than Toyota Verso. Due to the lower power, Volkswagen Caddy reaches 100 km/h speed 1.6 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.1 | 4.9 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.4 l/100km | 6.1 l/100km | |
|
The Toyota Verso is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Volkswagen Caddy consumes 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Verso, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Volkswagen Caddy could require 30 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Volkswagen Caddy consumes 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Verso. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1170 km in combined cycle | 1120 km in combined cycle | |
| 1270 km on highway | 1240 km on highway | ||
| 930 km with real consumption | 900 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 350'000 km | 350'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 6 years | 13 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used only for this car | Installed on at least 5 other car models, including Toyota Avensis, Toyota Corolla, Toyota RAV4, Toyota Auris | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Toyota Verso might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Volkswagen Caddy 2010 1.6 engine: The 1.6 TDI turbo diesel engine is generally reliable, which is especially reassuring given its frequent use in commercial vehicles. Even under heavy use, it can exceed 500,000 km, provided that maintenance is performed regularly and ... More about Volkswagen Caddy 2010 1.6 engine Toyota Verso 2013 2.0 engine: The 2.0-liter Toyota 1AD-FTV diesel engine, also known as the 2.0 D-4D, was produced from 2005 to 2018. In 2009, with the shift to Euro 5 emission standards, the engine was updated with piezo injectors replacing the earlier electromagnetic ones. It features an IHI RHF4 ... More about Toyota Verso 2013 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.41 m | 4.46 m | |
| Width: | 1.79 m | 1.79 m | |
| Height: | 1.86 m | 1.62 m | |
| Volkswagen Caddy is 5 cm shorter than the Toyota Verso, width is practically the same , while the height of Volkswagen Caddy is 24 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 560 litres | 484 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
3200 litres | 1740 litres | |
|
Volkswagen Caddy has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Volkswagen Caddy has 76 litres more trunk space than the Toyota Verso. The Toyota Verso may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Volkswagen Caddy (by 1460 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.1 meters | 11.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Volkswagen Caddy is 0.5 metres less than that of the Toyota Verso, which means Volkswagen Caddy can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`159 | 2`260 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | above average | |
| Toyota Verso has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Volkswagen Caddy has serious deffects in 40 percent more cases than Toyota Verso, so Toyota Verso quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 4800 | 6800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volkswagen Caddy has
|
Toyota Verso has
| |