Volkswagen Caddy 2010 vs Nissan Evalia (NV200) 2011
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Diesel | 1.5 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 102 HP | 90 HP | |
| Torque: | 250 NM | 200 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.9 seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Volkswagen Caddy engine produces 12 HP more power than Nissan Evalia (NV200), whereas torque is 50 NM more than Nissan Evalia (NV200). | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.1 | 5.3 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.4 l/100km | 6.1 l/100km | |
|
The Nissan Evalia (NV200) is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification Volkswagen Caddy consumes 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Evalia (NV200), which means that by driving the Volkswagen Caddy over 15,000 km in a year you can save 30 litres of fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Volkswagen Caddy consumes 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Evalia (NV200). | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1170 km in combined cycle | 1130 km in combined cycle | |
| 1270 km on highway | 1220 km on highway | ||
| 930 km with real consumption | 980 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 6 years | 8 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used only for this car | Installed on at least 22 other car models, including Nissan Qashqai, Renault Laguna, Renault Scenic, Dacia Duster, Nissan Juke | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Nissan Evalia (NV200) might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
| The Volkswagen Caddy engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
| Volkswagen Caddy 2010 1.6 engine: The 1.6 TDI turbo diesel engine is generally reliable, which is especially reassuring given its frequent use in commercial vehicles. Even under heavy use, it can exceed 500,000 km, provided that maintenance is performed regularly and ... More about Volkswagen Caddy 2010 1.6 engine Nissan Evalia (NV200) 2011 1.5 engine: The engine has many modifications, is sufficiently common and spare parts are available. The fuel consumption/power ratio is good. The fuel injection system can be a problem and the timing belt change interval ... More about Nissan Evalia (NV200) 2011 1.5 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.41 m | 4.40 m | |
| Width: | 1.79 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.86 m | 1.86 m | |
|
Volkswagen Caddy is larger, but slightly lower. Volkswagen Caddy and Nissan Evalia (NV200) are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 560 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
3200 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.1 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Volkswagen Caddy is 0.5 metres more than that of the Nissan Evalia (NV200), which means Volkswagen Caddy can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`159 | 2`030 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 5800 | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volkswagen Caddy has
|
Nissan Evalia (NV200) has
| |