Volkswagen Caddy 2010 vs Ford C-Max 2014
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Diesel | 1.6 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 102 HP | 115 HP | |
| Torque: | 250 NM | 215 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.9 seconds | 11.3 seconds | |
|
Ford C-Max is a more dynamic driving. Volkswagen Caddy engine produces 13 HP less power than Ford C-Max, but torque is 35 NM more than Ford C-Max. Due to the lower power, Volkswagen Caddy reaches 100 km/h speed 1.6 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.1 | 4.5 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.4 l/100km | 5.8 l/100km | |
|
The Ford C-Max is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Volkswagen Caddy consumes 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford C-Max, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Volkswagen Caddy could require 90 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Volkswagen Caddy consumes 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford C-Max. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1170 km in combined cycle | 1220 km in combined cycle | |
| 1270 km on highway | 1370 km on highway | ||
| 930 km with real consumption | 940 km with real consumption | ||
| Ground clearance: | 159 mm (6.3 inches) | 140 mm (5.5 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Volkswagen Caddy can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. Note, however, that this Volkswagen Caddy version does not have 4x4 drive, which is very important in poor road conditions. Choose from two 4x4 versions of Volkswagen Caddy 2010 if off-road driveability is important to you. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.41 m | 4.38 m | |
| Width: | 1.79 m | 1.83 m | |
| Height: | 1.86 m | 1.63 m | |
| Volkswagen Caddy is 3 cm longer than the Ford C-Max, 3 cm narrower, while the height of Volkswagen Caddy is 23 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 560 litres | 432 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
3200 litres | 1684 litres | |
|
Volkswagen Caddy has more luggage capacity. Volkswagen Caddy has 128 litres more trunk space than the Ford C-Max. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Volkswagen Caddy (by 1516 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.1 meters | 11.1 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`159 | 1`915 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Volkswagen Caddy scores higher in safety tests, but Ford C-Max is better rated in child safety tests. The Volkswagen Caddy scores significantly higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | below average | average | |
| Ford C-Max has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Volkswagen Caddy has serious deffects in 20 percent more cases than Ford C-Max, so Ford C-Max quality is probably better | |||
| Average price (€): | 5400 | 8200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volkswagen Caddy has
|
Ford C-Max has
| |