Volkswagen Caddy 2010 vs Ford C-Max 2007
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Diesel | 1.6 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain and belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 102 HP | 90 HP | |
| Torque: | 250 NM | 215 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.9 seconds | 13.1 seconds | |
|
Volkswagen Caddy is more dynamic to drive. Volkswagen Caddy engine produces 12 HP more power than Ford C-Max, whereas torque is 35 NM more than Ford C-Max. Thanks to more power Volkswagen Caddy reaches 100 km/h speed 0.2 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.1 | 4.8 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.4 l/100km | 5.6 l/100km | |
|
The Ford C-Max is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Volkswagen Caddy consumes 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford C-Max, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Volkswagen Caddy could require 45 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Volkswagen Caddy consumes 0.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford C-Max. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1170 km in combined cycle | 1140 km in combined cycle | |
| 930 km with real consumption | 980 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 350'000 km | 300'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Volkswagen Caddy engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 6 years | 5 years | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
| Volkswagen Caddy 2010 1.6 engine: The 1.6 TDI turbo diesel engine is generally reliable, which is especially reassuring given its frequent use in commercial vehicles. Even under heavy use, it can exceed 500,000 km, provided that maintenance is performed regularly and ... More about Volkswagen Caddy 2010 1.6 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.41 m | 4.33 m | |
| Width: | 1.79 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.86 m | 1.60 m | |
| Volkswagen Caddy is 8 cm longer than the Ford C-Max, 3 cm narrower, while the height of Volkswagen Caddy is 26 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 560 litres | 550 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
3200 litres | 1620 litres | |
| Volkswagen Caddy has 10 litres more trunk space than the Ford C-Max. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Volkswagen Caddy (by 1580 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.1 meters | 10.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Volkswagen Caddy is 0.4 metres more than that of the Ford C-Max, which means Volkswagen Caddy can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`159 | 1`920 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | average | high | |
| Ford C-Max has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Volkswagen Caddy has serious deffects in 25 percent more cases than Ford C-Max, so Ford C-Max quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 5800 | 2600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volkswagen Caddy has
|
Ford C-Max has
| |