Volkswagen Caddy 2010 vs Ford C-Max 2010
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Diesel | 1.6 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 102 HP | 115 HP | |
| Torque: | 250 NM | 270 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.9 seconds | 11.3 seconds | |
|
Ford C-Max is a more dynamic driving. Volkswagen Caddy engine produces 13 HP less power than Ford C-Max, whereas torque is 20 NM less than Ford C-Max. Due to the lower power, Volkswagen Caddy reaches 100 km/h speed 1.6 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.1 | 4.6 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.4 l/100km | 5.9 l/100km | |
|
The Ford C-Max is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Volkswagen Caddy consumes 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford C-Max, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Volkswagen Caddy could require 75 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Volkswagen Caddy consumes 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford C-Max. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 53 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1170 km in combined cycle | 1150 km in combined cycle | |
| 1270 km on highway | 1290 km on highway | ||
| 930 km with real consumption | 890 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Volkswagen Caddy 2010 1.6 engine: The 1.6 TDI turbo diesel engine is generally reliable, which is especially reassuring given its frequent use in commercial vehicles. Even under heavy use, it can exceed 500,000 km, provided that maintenance is performed regularly and ... More about Volkswagen Caddy 2010 1.6 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.41 m | 4.38 m | |
| Width: | 1.79 m | 1.83 m | |
| Height: | 1.86 m | 1.63 m | |
| Volkswagen Caddy is 3 cm longer than the Ford C-Max, 3 cm narrower, while the height of Volkswagen Caddy is 23 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 560 litres | 432 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
3200 litres | 1684 litres | |
|
Volkswagen Caddy has more luggage capacity. Volkswagen Caddy has 128 litres more trunk space than the Ford C-Max. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Volkswagen Caddy (by 1516 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.1 meters | 10.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Volkswagen Caddy is 0.2 metres more than that of the Ford C-Max. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`159 | 1`915 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Ford C-Max scores higher in safety tests. | |||
| Quality: | below average | average | |
| Ford C-Max has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Volkswagen Caddy has serious deffects in 20 percent more cases than Ford C-Max, so Ford C-Max quality is probably better | |||
| Average price (€): | 5800 | 5200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volkswagen Caddy has
|
Ford C-Max has
| |