Volkswagen Caddy 2010 vs Citroen C4 Picasso 2013
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Diesel | 1.6 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 102 HP | 112 HP | |
| Torque: | 250 NM | 270 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.9 seconds | 11.8 seconds | |
|
Citroen C4 Picasso is a more dynamic driving. Volkswagen Caddy engine produces 10 HP less power than Citroen C4 Picasso, whereas torque is 20 NM less than Citroen C4 Picasso. Due to the lower power, Volkswagen Caddy reaches 100 km/h speed 1.1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.1 | 4.0 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.4 l/100km | 5.8 l/100km | |
|
The Citroen C4 Picasso is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Volkswagen Caddy consumes 1.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Citroen C4 Picasso, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Volkswagen Caddy could require 165 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Volkswagen Caddy consumes 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Citroen C4 Picasso. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1170 km in combined cycle | 1370 km in combined cycle | |
| 1270 km on highway | 1440 km on highway | ||
| 930 km with real consumption | 940 km with real consumption | ||
| Citroen C4 Picasso gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.41 m | 4.44 m | |
| Width: | 1.79 m | 1.83 m | |
| Height: | 1.86 m | 1.61 m | |
|
Volkswagen Caddy is smaller, but higher. Volkswagen Caddy is 3 cm shorter than the Citroen C4 Picasso, 3 cm narrower, while the height of Volkswagen Caddy is 25 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 560 litres | 537 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
3200 litres | no data | |
|
Volkswagen Caddy has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Volkswagen Caddy has 23 litres more trunk space than the Citroen C4 Picasso. The Citroen C4 Picasso may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.1 meters | 10.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Volkswagen Caddy is 0.3 metres more than that of the Citroen C4 Picasso. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`159 | 1`940 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Citroen C4 Picasso scores higher in safety tests. The Citroen C4 Picasso scores higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | below average | below average | |
| Citroen C4 Picasso has slightly fewer faults. Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Volkswagen Caddy, so Citroen C4 Picasso quality could be a bit better. | |||
| Average price (€): | 6200 | 13 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volkswagen Caddy has
|
Citroen C4 Picasso has
| |