Volkswagen Caddy 2015 vs Volkswagen Sharan 2010
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.4 Petrol | 1.4 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 125 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 220 NM | 240 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.3 seconds | 10.7 seconds | |
| Volkswagen Caddy engine produces 25 HP less power than Volkswagen Sharan, whereas torque is 20 NM less than Volkswagen Sharan. Despite less power, Volkswagen Caddy reaches 100 km/h speed 0.4 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.7 | 7.2 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.7 l/100km | 9.3 l/100km | |
|
The Volkswagen Caddy is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Volkswagen Caddy consumes 1.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Sharan, which means that by driving the Volkswagen Caddy over 15,000 km in a year you can save 225 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Volkswagen Caddy consumes 1.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Sharan. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 960 km in combined cycle | 970 km in combined cycle | |
| 1050 km on highway | 1140 km on highway | ||
| 710 km with real consumption | 750 km with real consumption | ||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.41 m | 4.85 m | |
| Width: | 1.79 m | 1.90 m | |
| Height: | 1.82 m | 1.74 m | |
|
Volkswagen Caddy is smaller, but higher. Volkswagen Caddy is 45 cm shorter than the Volkswagen Sharan, 11 cm narrower, while the height of Volkswagen Caddy is 9 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 190 litres | 809 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
3200 litres | no data | |
|
Volkswagen Sharan has more luggage space. Volkswagen Caddy has 619 litres less trunk space than the Volkswagen Sharan. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.1 meters | 12 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Volkswagen Caddy is 0.9 metres less than that of the Volkswagen Sharan, which means Volkswagen Caddy can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`095 | 2`290 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | low | low | |
| Volkswagen Caddy has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Volkswagen Sharan has serious deffects in 20 percent more cases than Volkswagen Caddy, so Volkswagen Caddy quality is probably better | |||
| Average price (€): | 11 200 | 13 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volkswagen Caddy has
|
Volkswagen Sharan has
| |