Volkswagen Caddy 2015 vs Volkswagen Sharan 2010
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 102 HP | 140 HP | |
| Torque: | 250 NM | 320 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12 seconds | 10.9 seconds | |
|
Volkswagen Sharan is a more dynamic driving. Volkswagen Caddy engine produces 38 HP less power than Volkswagen Sharan, whereas torque is 70 NM less than Volkswagen Sharan. Due to the lower power, Volkswagen Caddy reaches 100 km/h speed 1.1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.6 | 5.5 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.4 l/100km | 7.1 l/100km | |
|
The Volkswagen Caddy is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Volkswagen Caddy consumes 0.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Sharan, which means that by driving the Volkswagen Caddy over 15,000 km in a year you can save 135 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Volkswagen Caddy consumes 0.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Sharan. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1300 km in combined cycle | 1270 km in combined cycle | |
| 1500 km on highway | 1450 km on highway | ||
| 930 km with real consumption | 980 km with real consumption | ||
| Volkswagen Sharan 2010 2.0 engine: The engine is very durable and can last a long time with proper maintenance, and is also quite economical for its power. There may be some problems with the turbine geometry. It is important to use good ... More about Volkswagen Sharan 2010 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.41 m | 4.85 m | |
| Width: | 1.79 m | 1.90 m | |
| Height: | 1.82 m | 1.74 m | |
|
Volkswagen Caddy is smaller, but higher. Volkswagen Caddy is 45 cm shorter than the Volkswagen Sharan, 11 cm narrower, while the height of Volkswagen Caddy is 9 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 190 litres | 809 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
3200 litres | no data | |
|
Volkswagen Sharan has more luggage space. Volkswagen Caddy has 619 litres less trunk space than the Volkswagen Sharan. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.1 meters | 11.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Volkswagen Caddy is 0.8 metres less than that of the Volkswagen Sharan, which means Volkswagen Caddy can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`141 | 2`340 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | low | low | |
| Volkswagen Caddy has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Volkswagen Sharan has serious deffects in 20 percent more cases than Volkswagen Caddy, so Volkswagen Caddy quality is probably better | |||
| Average price (€): | 11 200 | 13 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volkswagen Caddy has
|
Volkswagen Sharan has
| |