Volkswagen Caddy 2010 vs Ford Galaxy 2006
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 LPG | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 102 HP | 145 HP | |
| Torque: | 148 NM | 190 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.7 seconds | 11.2 seconds | |
|
Ford Galaxy is a more dynamic driving. Volkswagen Caddy engine produces 43 HP less power than Ford Galaxy, whereas torque is 42 NM less than Ford Galaxy. Due to the lower power, Volkswagen Caddy reaches 100 km/h speed 2.5 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.1 | 8.2 | |
| Volkswagen Caddy consumes 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford Galaxy, which means that by driving the Volkswagen Caddy over 15,000 km in a year you can save 15 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 740 km in combined cycle | 850 km in combined cycle | |
| 890 km on highway | 1070 km on highway | ||
| Ford Galaxy gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.41 m | 4.82 m | |
| Width: | 1.79 m | 1.85 m | |
| Height: | 1.82 m | 1.72 m | |
|
Volkswagen Caddy is smaller, but higher. Volkswagen Caddy is 41 cm shorter than the Ford Galaxy, 6 cm narrower, while the height of Volkswagen Caddy is 10 cm higher. | |||
| Seats: | no data | 7 seats | |
| Trunk capacity: | 918 litres | 308 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | no data | 308 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | 918 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
3200 litres | 2325 litres | |
| The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Volkswagen Caddy (by 875 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.1 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight: | 2`180 kg | 2`415 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`464 kg | 1`625 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 716 kg | 790 kg | |
| Volkswagen Caddy load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 10 procentiem less than Ford Galaxy. Therefore, Ford Galaxy is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | average | low | |
| Volkswagen Caddy has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Ford Galaxy has serious deffects in 30 percent more cases than Volkswagen Caddy, so Volkswagen Caddy quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 5200 | 3200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volkswagen Caddy has
|
Ford Galaxy has
| |