Volkswagen Caddy 2010 vs Nissan Evalia (NV200) 2011
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 LPG | 1.6 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 102 HP | 110 HP | |
| Torque: | 148 NM | 153 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.7 seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Volkswagen Caddy engine produces 8 HP less power than Nissan Evalia (NV200), whereas torque is 5 NM less than Nissan Evalia (NV200). | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.1 | 7.3 | |
|
The Nissan Evalia (NV200) is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Volkswagen Caddy consumes 0.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Evalia (NV200), which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Volkswagen Caddy could require 120 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 740 km in combined cycle | 820 km in combined cycle | |
| 890 km on highway | 950 km on highway | ||
| Nissan Evalia (NV200) gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Nissan Evalia (NV200) 2011 1.6 engine: A simple and reliable engine, not particularly demanding on fuel quality. Tends to consume more oil, may have problems starting in cold weather. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.41 m | 4.40 m | |
| Width: | 1.79 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.82 m | 1.86 m | |
|
Volkswagen Caddy is larger, but slightly lower. Volkswagen Caddy and Nissan Evalia (NV200) are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 918 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
3200 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.1 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Volkswagen Caddy is 0.5 metres more than that of the Nissan Evalia (NV200), which means Volkswagen Caddy can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`180 | 1`980 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 5400 | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Nissan Evalia (NV200) has
| |