Volkswagen Caddy 2015 vs Volkswagen Sharan 2010
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 140 HP | 140 HP | |
| Torque: | 320 NM | 320 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.2 seconds | 10.9 seconds | |
| Volkswagen Caddy and Volkswagen Sharan have the same engine power, the torque is the same for both cars. Volkswagen Caddy reaches 100 km/h speed 1.7 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.9 | 5.5 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.5 l/100km | 7.1 l/100km | |
|
By specification Volkswagen Caddy consumes 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Sharan, which means that by driving the Volkswagen Caddy over 15,000 km in a year you can save 90 litres of fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Volkswagen Caddy consumes 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Sharan. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1220 km in combined cycle | 1270 km in combined cycle | |
| 1420 km on highway | 1450 km on highway | ||
| 800 km with real consumption | 980 km with real consumption | ||
| Volkswagen Sharan 2010 2.0 engine: The engine is very durable and can last a long time with proper maintenance, and is also quite economical for its power. There may be some problems with the turbine geometry. It is important to use good ... More about Volkswagen Sharan 2010 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.51 m | 4.85 m | |
| Width: | 1.79 m | 1.90 m | |
| Height: | 1.82 m | 1.74 m | |
|
Volkswagen Caddy is smaller, but higher. Volkswagen Caddy is 35 cm shorter than the Volkswagen Sharan, 11 cm narrower, while the height of Volkswagen Caddy is 8 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 190 litres | 809 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
3200 litres | no data | |
|
Volkswagen Sharan has more luggage space. Volkswagen Caddy has 619 litres less trunk space than the Volkswagen Sharan. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.1 meters | 11.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Volkswagen Caddy is 0.8 metres less than that of the Volkswagen Sharan, which means Volkswagen Caddy can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`160 | 2`340 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | low | low | |
| Volkswagen Caddy has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Volkswagen Sharan has serious deffects in 20 percent more cases than Volkswagen Caddy, so Volkswagen Caddy quality is probably better | |||
| Average price (€): | 11 200 | 13 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volkswagen Caddy has
|
Volkswagen Sharan has
| |