Volkswagen Caddy 2004 vs Volkswagen Sharan 2000

Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison

 
Volkswagen Caddy
2004 - 2010
Volkswagen Sharan
2000 - 2010
Gearbox: Manual/AutomaticManual/Automatic
Wheel drive type: Front wheel drive (FWD)Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)
Volkswagen Caddy is available only with front wheel drive, while Volkswagen Sharan can be equipped with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive.
Engines: 1.4 - 2.01.8 - 2.8

Performance

Power: 69 - 109 HP90 - 204 HP
Torque: 126 - 250 NM170 - 310 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 13.3 - 20.5 seconds9.9 - 17.2 seconds
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison!

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 6.0 - 8.36.2 - 11.9
Volkswagen Caddy petrol engines consumes on average 2.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than Volkswagen Sharan. On average, Volkswagen Caddy equipped with diesel engines consume 1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Sharan.
This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version!

Dimensions

Length: 4.40 m4.63 m
Width: 1.80 m1.81 m
Height: 1.83 m1.73 m
Volkswagen Caddy is smaller, but higher.
Volkswagen Caddy is 23 cm shorter than the Volkswagen Sharan, 1 cm narrower, while the height of Volkswagen Caddy is 10 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 560 litres256 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
2239 litresno data
Volkswagen Caddy has more luggage capacity.
Even though the car is shorter, Volkswagen Caddy has 304 litres more trunk space than the Volkswagen Sharan. The Volkswagen Sharan may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers.
Turning diameter: 11.3 meters11.9 meters
The turning circle of the Volkswagen Caddy is 0.6 metres less than that of the Volkswagen Sharan, which means Volkswagen Caddy can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): ~ 2`024~ 1`954
Safety: no data
Quality:
average

low
Average price (€): 30002600
Rating in user reviews: 7.8/10 6.1/10
Pros and Cons: Volkswagen Caddy has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • roomier boot
  • better manoeuvrability
  • fewer faults
  • higher ratings in user reviews
Volkswagen Sharan has
  • available with 4x4 drive
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv