Volkswagen Caddy 2004 vs Ford Galaxy 2006
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.4 - 2.0 | 2.0 - 2.3 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 69 - 109 HP | 130 - 161 HP | |
| Torque: | 126 - 250 NM | 190 - 320 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.3 - 20.5 seconds | 10.5 - 11.6 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.0 - 8.3 | 6.5 - 8.2 | |
|
On average, the Volkswagen Caddy petrol engines consume nearly the same amount of fuel per 100 km as Ford Galaxy. On average, Volkswagen Caddy equipped with diesel engines consume 0.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford Galaxy. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.40 m | 4.82 m | |
| Width: | 1.80 m | 1.85 m | |
| Height: | 1.83 m | 1.72 m | |
|
Volkswagen Caddy is smaller, but higher. Volkswagen Caddy is 42 cm shorter than the Ford Galaxy, 5 cm narrower, while the height of Volkswagen Caddy is 11 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 560 litres | 390 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
2239 litres | no data | |
|
Volkswagen Caddy has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Volkswagen Caddy has 170 litres more trunk space than the Ford Galaxy. The Ford Galaxy may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.3 meters | 11.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Volkswagen Caddy is 0.3 metres less than that of the Ford Galaxy. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`024 | ~ 1`768 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | average | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 3000 | 4000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volkswagen Caddy has
|
Ford Galaxy has
| |