Volkswagen Caddy 2010 vs Ford Galaxy 2006
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
| Volkswagen Caddy is available with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive, while Ford Galaxy can be equipped only with front wheel drive. | |||
| Engines: | 1.2 - 2.0 (petrol, diesel, lPG) | 2.0 - 2.3 (petrol, diesel) | |
| Both cars are available with petrol and diesel engines. Volkswagen Caddy is available also with LPG engines. LPG engines generally provide lower running costs and cleaner emissions compared to petrol and diesel engines. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 75 - 170 HP | 130 - 161 HP | |
| Torque: | 148 - 350 NM | 190 - 320 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.2 - 17.6 seconds | 10.5 - 11.6 seconds | |
| In general, Ford Galaxy are available with more powerful and dynamic engines than Volkswagen Caddy. Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.1 - 8.7 | 6.5 - 9.8 | |
|
Volkswagen Caddy petrol engines consumes on average 2.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than Ford Galaxy. On average, Volkswagen Caddy equipped with diesel engines consume 1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford Galaxy. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.41 m | 4.82 m | |
| Width: | 1.79 m | 1.85 m | |
| Height: | 1.85 m | 1.72 m | |
|
Volkswagen Caddy is smaller, but higher. Volkswagen Caddy is 41 cm shorter than the Ford Galaxy, 6 cm narrower, while the height of Volkswagen Caddy is 13 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 918 litres | 390 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
3200 litres | 2325 litres | |
|
Volkswagen Caddy has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, The Ford Galaxy may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Volkswagen Caddy (by 875 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.1 meters | 11.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Volkswagen Caddy is 0.5 metres less than that of the Ford Galaxy, which means Volkswagen Caddy can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | ~ 2`202 kg | ~ 2`460 kg | |
| Net weight: | ~ 1`472 kg | ~ 1`680 kg | |
| Load capacity: | ~ 730 kg | ~ 780 kg | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | below average | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 5400 | 3000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volkswagen Caddy has
|
Ford Galaxy has
| |