Volkswagen Caddy 2020 vs Volkswagen Sharan 2010

Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison

 
Volkswagen Caddy
2020 -
Volkswagen Sharan
2010 - 2015
Gearbox: Manual/AutomaticManual/Automatic
Engines: 1.5 - 2.01.4 - 2.0

Performance

Power: 75 - 122 HP140 - 200 HP
Torque: 220 - 320 NM240 - 350 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 10.5 - 16.7 seconds8.3 - 10.9 seconds
In general, Volkswagen Sharan are available with more powerful and dynamic engines than Volkswagen Caddy. Select a car version for a more accurate comparison!

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 4.4 - 5.65.5 - 8.4
Volkswagen Caddy petrol engines consumes on average 2.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than Volkswagen Sharan. On average, Volkswagen Caddy equipped with diesel engines consume 1.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Sharan.
This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version!
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.
Ground clearance: 160 mm (6.3 inches)163 mm (6.4 inches)

Dimensions

Length: 4.50 m4.85 m
Width: 1.86 m1.90 m
Height: 1.82 m1.74 m
Volkswagen Caddy is smaller, but higher.
Volkswagen Caddy is 35 cm shorter than the Volkswagen Sharan, 5 cm narrower, while the height of Volkswagen Caddy is 8 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 3100 litres885 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down, if possible
3100 litres2430 litres
Volkswagen Caddy has more luggage capacity.
Even though the car is shorter, The Volkswagen Sharan may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Volkswagen Caddy (by 670 litres).
Turning diameter: 11.4 meters11.9 meters
The turning circle of the Volkswagen Caddy is 0.5 metres less than that of the Volkswagen Sharan, which means Volkswagen Caddy can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight: ~ 2`202 kg~ 2`342 kg
Net weight:~ 1`459 kg~ 1`759 kg
Load capacity:~ 743 kg~ 583 kg
Volkswagen Caddy load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 22 procentiem more than Volkswagen Sharan. Therefore, Volkswagen Caddy is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads.
Safety: no data
Quality: no data
low
Average price (€): 21 20010 800
Pros and Cons: Volkswagen Caddy has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • roomier boot
  • higher carrying (cargo) capacity
Volkswagen Sharan has
  • more powerful and dynamic engines
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv