Volkswagen Bora 2000 vs Volkswagen Vento 1992

 
Volkswagen Bora
2000 - 2005
Volkswagen Vento
1992 - 1998
Gearbox: AutomaticAutomatic
Engine: 2.3 Petrol2.0 Petrol

Performance

Power: 170 HP115 HP
Torque: 220 NM166 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 9.2 seconds12.2 seconds
Volkswagen Bora is more dynamic to drive.
Volkswagen Bora engine produces 55 HP more power than Volkswagen Vento, whereas torque is 54 NM more than Volkswagen Vento. Thanks to more power Volkswagen Bora reaches 100 km/h speed 3 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 9.79.2
The Volkswagen Vento is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
Volkswagen Bora consumes 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Vento, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Volkswagen Bora could require 75 litres more fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 55 litres55 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 560 km in combined cycle590 km in combined cycle
750 km on highway800 km on highway
Volkswagen Vento gets more mileage on one fuel tank.
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.

Dimensions

Length: 4.38 m4.38 m
Width: 1.74 m1.70 m
Height: 1.45 m1.42 m
Volkswagen Bora and Volkswagen Vento are practically the same length.
Trunk capacity: 455 litresno data
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
785 litresno data
Turning diameter: 11 meters10.7 meters
The turning circle of the Volkswagen Bora is 0.3 metres more than that of the Volkswagen Vento.
Gross weight (kg): 1`8801`200
Safety: no datano data
Quality: no datano data
Average price (€): 12001000
Rating in user reviews: 7.8/10 6.3/10
Pros and Cons: Volkswagen Bora has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • higher ratings in user reviews
Volkswagen Vento has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv