Volkswagen Bora 2000 vs Volkswagen Polo 2006

 
Volkswagen Bora
2000 - 2005
Volkswagen Polo
2006 - 2009
Body: SedanHatchback
The hatchback generally has more luggage space thanks to a larger trunk door opening and the ability to convert the rear of the passenger compartment into luggage space. Sedans tend to be quieter than hatchbacks, due to a more isolated rear area.
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 2.3 Petrol1.8 Petrol

Performance

Power: 170 HP150 HP
Torque: 220 NM220 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 8.5 seconds8.2 seconds
Volkswagen Bora engine produces 20 HP more power than Volkswagen Polo, the torque is the same for both cars. Despite the higher power, Volkswagen Bora reaches 100 km/h speed 0.3 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 8.77.8
Real fuel consumption: 9.9 l/100km9.1 l/100km
The Volkswagen Polo is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Volkswagen Bora consumes 0.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Polo, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Volkswagen Bora could require 135 litres more fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Volkswagen Bora consumes 0.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Polo.
Fuel tank capacity: 55 litres45 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 630 km in combined cycle570 km in combined cycle
830 km on highway730 km on highway
550 km with real consumption490 km with real consumption
Volkswagen Bora gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Dimensions

Length: 4.38 m3.92 m
Width: 1.74 m1.65 m
Height: 1.45 m1.47 m
Volkswagen Bora is larger, but slightly lower.
Volkswagen Bora is 46 cm longer than the Volkswagen Polo, 9 cm wider, while the height of Volkswagen Bora is 2 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 455 litres270 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
785 litres1030 litres
Volkswagen Bora has 185 litres more trunk space than the Volkswagen Polo. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Volkswagen Polo (by 245 litres).
Turning diameter: 11 meters10.6 meters
The turning circle of the Volkswagen Bora is 0.4 metres more than that of the Volkswagen Polo, which means Volkswagen Bora can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): 1`8401`650
Safety: no datano data
Quality: no data
below average
Average price (€): 14002200
Rating in user reviews: 8.0/10 8.0/10
Pros and Cons: Volkswagen Bora has
  • more power
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • roomier boot
  • lower price
Volkswagen Polo has
  • lower fuel consumption
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv