Volkswagen Bora 2000 vs Volkswagen Passat 2000

 
Volkswagen Bora
2000 - 2005
Volkswagen Passat
2000 - 2004
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 2.3 Petrol2.3 Petrol

Performance

Power: 170 HP170 HP
Torque: 220 NM220 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 8.5 seconds9.1 seconds
Volkswagen Bora and Volkswagen Passat have the same engine power, the torque is the same for both cars. Volkswagen Bora reaches 100 km/h speed 0.6 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 8.79.4
Real fuel consumption: 9.9 l/100km10.0 l/100km
The Volkswagen Bora is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Volkswagen Bora consumes 0.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Passat, which means that by driving the Volkswagen Bora over 15,000 km in a year you can save 105 litres of fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Volkswagen Bora consumes 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Passat.
Fuel tank capacity: 55 litres62 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 630 km in combined cycle650 km in combined cycle
830 km on highway860 km on highway
550 km with real consumption620 km with real consumption

Dimensions

Length: 4.38 m4.70 m
Width: 1.74 m1.75 m
Height: 1.45 m1.46 m
Volkswagen Bora is smaller.
Volkswagen Bora is 32 cm shorter than the Volkswagen Passat, 1 cm narrower, while the height of Volkswagen Bora is 1 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 455 litres475 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
785 litresno data
Volkswagen Bora has 20 litres less trunk space than the Volkswagen Passat.
Turning diameter: 11 meters11 meters
Gross weight (kg): 1`8401`980
Safety: no data
Quality: no data
average
Average price (€): 14001400
Rating in user reviews: 8.0/10 7.9/10
Pros and Cons: Volkswagen Bora has
  • more dynamic
  • lower fuel consumption
    Share these results to social networks or e-mail
    Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv