Volkswagen Bora 1998 vs Volkswagen Passat 2000

 
Volkswagen Bora
1998 - 2002
Volkswagen Passat
2000 - 2002
Gearbox: AutomaticAutomatic
Engine: 2.0 Petrol2.0 Petrol

Performance

Power: 115 HP115 HP
Torque: 170 NM172 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 12 seconds12 seconds
Volkswagen Bora and Volkswagen Passat have the same engine power, but Volkswagen Bora torque is 2 NM less than Volkswagen Passat.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 8.99.6
Real fuel consumption: 10.1 l/100km10.1 l/100km
The Volkswagen Bora is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Volkswagen Bora consumes 0.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Passat, which means that by driving the Volkswagen Bora over 15,000 km in a year you can save 105 litres of fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 55 litres62 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 610 km in combined cycle640 km in combined cycle
800 km on highway820 km on highway
540 km with real consumption610 km with real consumption

Dimensions

Length: 4.38 m4.70 m
Width: 1.74 m1.75 m
Height: 1.45 m1.46 m
Volkswagen Bora is smaller.
Volkswagen Bora is 32 cm shorter than the Volkswagen Passat, 1 cm narrower, while the height of Volkswagen Bora is 1 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 455 litres475 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
785 litresno data
Volkswagen Bora has 20 litres less trunk space than the Volkswagen Passat.
Turning diameter: 11 meters11 meters
Gross weight (kg): 1`8101`930
Safety: no data
Quality: no data
average
Average price (€): 12001400
Rating in user reviews: 8.0/10 7.9/10
Pros and Cons: Volkswagen Bora has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • lower price
    Share these results to social networks or e-mail
    Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv