Volkswagen Bora 1998 vs Volvo S40 2000

 
Volkswagen Bora
1998 - 2001
Volvo S40
2000 - 2002
Gearbox: ManualAutomatic
Engine: 1.9 Diesel1.9 Petrol

Performance

Power: 90 HP165 HP
Torque: 210 NM240 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 13 seconds9 seconds
Volvo S40 is a more dynamic driving.
Volkswagen Bora engine produces 75 HP less power than Volvo S40, whereas torque is 30 NM less than Volvo S40. Due to the lower power, Volkswagen Bora reaches 100 km/h speed 4 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 5.09.1
The Volkswagen Bora is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
Volkswagen Bora consumes 4.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo S40, which means that by driving the Volkswagen Bora over 15,000 km in a year you can save 615 litres of fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 55 litres60 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 1100 km in combined cycle650 km in combined cycle
1300 km on highway900 km on highway
Volkswagen Bora gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Dimensions

Length: 4.38 m4.48 m
Width: 1.74 m1.72 m
Height: 1.45 m1.41 m
Volkswagen Bora is 10 cm shorter than the Volvo S40, 2 cm wider, while the height of Volkswagen Bora is 4 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 455 litres471 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
785 litres853 litres
Volkswagen Bora has 16 litres less trunk space than the Volvo S40. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Volvo S40 (by 68 litres).
Turning diameter: 11 meters11 meters
Gross weight (kg): 1`8201`780
Safety: no datano data
Quality: no data
average
Average price (€): 1400800
Rating in user reviews: 8.0/10 6.9/10
Pros and Cons: Volkswagen Bora has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • higher ratings in user reviews
Volvo S40 has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv