Volkswagen Bora 2000 vs Volkswagen Golf 1998
Body: | Sedan | Hatchback | |
---|---|---|---|
The hatchback generally has more luggage space thanks to a larger trunk door opening and the ability to convert the rear of the passenger compartment into luggage space. Sedans tend to be quieter than hatchbacks, due to a more isolated rear area. | |||
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
Engine: | 1.8 Petrol | 1.8 Petrol | |
Camshaft drive: | Timing chain and belt | Timing chain and belt | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 150 HP | 125 HP | |
Torque: | 210 NM | 170 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.9 seconds | 9.9 seconds | |
Volkswagen Bora is more dynamic to drive. Volkswagen Bora engine produces 25 HP more power than Volkswagen Golf, whereas torque is 40 NM more than Volkswagen Golf. Thanks to more power Volkswagen Bora reaches 100 km/h speed 1 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.9 | 8.3 | |
Real fuel consumption: | 9.2 l/100km | 8.7 l/100km | |
The Volkswagen Golf is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification Volkswagen Bora consumes 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Golf, which means that by driving the Volkswagen Bora over 15,000 km in a year you can save 60 litres of fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Volkswagen Bora consumes 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Golf. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 55 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 690 km in combined cycle | 660 km in combined cycle | |
880 km on highway | 870 km on highway | ||
590 km with real consumption | 630 km with real consumption | ||
Engines | |||
Average engine lifespan: | 440'000 km | 460'000 km | |
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
Engine production duration: | 9 years | 4 years | |
Engine spread: | Installed on at least 9 other car models, including Volkswagen Passat, Volkswagen Golf, Audi A4, Skoda Octavia, Audi A3 | Installed on at least 5 other car models, including Audi A6, Audi A4, Skoda Octavia, Volkswagen Bora | |
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Volkswagen Bora might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.38 m | 4.15 m | |
Width: | 1.74 m | 1.74 m | |
Height: | 1.45 m | 1.44 m | |
Volkswagen Bora is 23 cm longer than the Volkswagen Golf, width is practically the same , while the height of Volkswagen Bora is 1 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 455 litres | 330 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
785 litres | 1184 litres | |
Volkswagen Bora has 125 litres more trunk space than the Volkswagen Golf. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Volkswagen Golf (by 399 litres). | |||
Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 10.9 meters | |
The turning circle of the Volkswagen Bora is 0.1 metres more than that of the Volkswagen Golf. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 1`790 | 1`695 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | no data | above average | |
Average price (€): | 1200 | 1400 | |
Rating in user reviews: | 8.0/10 | 7.4/10 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Volkswagen Bora has
|
| |