Volkswagen Bora 2000 vs Volkswagen Polo 2006
| Body: | Sedan | Hatchback | |
|---|---|---|---|
| The hatchback generally has more luggage space thanks to a larger trunk door opening and the ability to convert the rear of the passenger compartment into luggage space. Sedans tend to be quieter than hatchbacks, due to a more isolated rear area. | |||
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 102 HP | 105 HP | |
| Torque: | 148 NM | 153 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 14 seconds | 11.3 seconds | |
|
Volkswagen Polo is a more dynamic driving. Volkswagen Bora engine produces 3 HP less power than Volkswagen Polo, whereas torque is 5 NM less than Volkswagen Polo. Due to the lower power, Volkswagen Bora reaches 100 km/h speed 2.7 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.1 | 7.4 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 9.3 l/100km | 7.6 l/100km | |
|
The Volkswagen Polo is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Volkswagen Bora consumes 0.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Polo, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Volkswagen Bora could require 105 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Volkswagen Bora consumes 1.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Polo. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 45 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 670 km in combined cycle | 600 km in combined cycle | |
| 870 km on highway | 760 km on highway | ||
| 590 km with real consumption | 590 km with real consumption | ||
| Volkswagen Bora gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.38 m | 3.92 m | |
| Width: | 1.74 m | 1.65 m | |
| Height: | 1.45 m | 1.47 m | |
|
Volkswagen Bora is larger, but slightly lower. Volkswagen Bora is 46 cm longer than the Volkswagen Polo, 9 cm wider, while the height of Volkswagen Bora is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 455 litres | 270 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
785 litres | 1030 litres | |
| Volkswagen Bora has 185 litres more trunk space than the Volkswagen Polo. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Volkswagen Polo (by 245 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Volkswagen Bora is 0.4 metres more than that of the Volkswagen Polo, which means Volkswagen Bora can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`780 | 1`650 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 1400 | 2200 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 8.0/10 | 8.0/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volkswagen Bora has
|
Volkswagen Polo has
| |