Volkswagen Bora 1998 vs Volvo S40 1996

 
Volkswagen Bora
1998 - 2000
Volvo S40
1996 - 1999
Gearbox: ManualAutomatic
Engine: 1.6 Petrol1.7 Petrol
Camshaft drive: Timing beltTiming belt

Performance

Power: 101 HP115 HP
Torque: 145 NM165 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 12 seconds12 seconds
Volkswagen Bora engine produces 14 HP less power than Volvo S40, whereas torque is 20 NM less than Volvo S40.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 7.59.1
Real fuel consumption: 8.1 l/100km10.1 l/100km
The Volkswagen Bora is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Volkswagen Bora consumes 1.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo S40, which means that by driving the Volkswagen Bora over 15,000 km in a year you can save 240 litres of fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Volkswagen Bora consumes 2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo S40.
Fuel tank capacity: 55 litres60 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 730 km in combined cycle650 km in combined cycle
940 km on highway860 km on highway
670 km with real consumption590 km with real consumption
Volkswagen Bora gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Engines

Average engine lifespan: 480'000 km440'000 km
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Volkswagen Bora engine could be longer.
Engine production duration: 14 years4 years
Engine spread: Used also on Volkswagen GolfUsed also on Volvo V40
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Volkswagen Bora might be a better choice in this respect.
Volkswagen Bora 1998 1.6 engine: The most common issues with this engine are unstable idle and excessive vibrations. These problems are often resolved by cleaning the fuel injectors or the throttle body. Another frequent source of trouble ...  More about Volkswagen Bora 1998 1.6 engine 

Dimensions

Length: 4.38 m4.48 m
Width: 1.74 m1.72 m
Height: 1.45 m1.41 m
Volkswagen Bora is 10 cm shorter than the Volvo S40, 2 cm wider, while the height of Volkswagen Bora is 4 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 455 litres471 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
785 litres853 litres
Volkswagen Bora has 16 litres less trunk space than the Volvo S40. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Volvo S40 (by 68 litres).
Turning diameter: 11 meters11 meters
Gross weight (kg): 1`7201`720
Safety: no data
Quality: no data
average
Average price (€): 1400600
Rating in user reviews: 8.0/10 7.1/10
Pros and Cons: Volkswagen Bora has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • longer expected engine lifespan
  • higher ratings in user reviews
Volvo S40 has
  • more power
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv