Volkswagen Bora 1998 vs Toyota Corolla 2000
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 101 HP | 110 HP | |
| Torque: | 145 NM | 150 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12 seconds | 10 seconds | |
|
Toyota Corolla is a more dynamic driving. Volkswagen Bora engine produces 9 HP less power than Toyota Corolla, whereas torque is 5 NM less than Toyota Corolla. Due to the lower power, Volkswagen Bora reaches 100 km/h speed 2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.5 | 7.0 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.1 l/100km | 7.3 l/100km | |
|
The Toyota Corolla is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Volkswagen Bora consumes 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Corolla, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Volkswagen Bora could require 75 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Volkswagen Bora consumes 0.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Corolla. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 50 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 730 km in combined cycle | 710 km in combined cycle | |
| 940 km on highway | 840 km on highway | ||
| 670 km with real consumption | 680 km with real consumption | ||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 14 years | 15 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used also on Volkswagen Golf | Used only for this car | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Volkswagen Bora might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
| The Volkswagen Bora engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
| Volkswagen Bora 1998 1.6 engine: The most common issues with this engine are unstable idle and excessive vibrations. These problems are often resolved by cleaning the fuel injectors or the throttle body.
Another frequent source of trouble ... More about Volkswagen Bora 1998 1.6 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.38 m | 4.32 m | |
| Width: | 1.74 m | 1.69 m | |
| Height: | 1.45 m | 1.38 m | |
|
Volkswagen Bora is larger. Volkswagen Bora is 6 cm longer than the Toyota Corolla, 5 cm wider, while the height of Volkswagen Bora is 7 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 455 litres | 437 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
785 litres | no data | |
| Volkswagen Bora has 18 litres more trunk space than the Toyota Corolla. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 9.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Volkswagen Bora is 1.4 metres more than that of the Toyota Corolla, which means Volkswagen Bora can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`720 | 1`655 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | high | |
| Average price (€): | 1400 | 1400 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 8.0/10 | 7.4/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volkswagen Bora has
|
Toyota Corolla has
| |