Volkswagen Bora 1998 vs Seat Toledo 2000

 
Volkswagen Bora
1998 - 2000
Seat Toledo
2000 - 2004
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 1.6 Petrol1.6 Petrol

Performance

Power: 101 HP105 HP
Torque: 145 NM148 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 12 seconds10.9 seconds
Seat Toledo is a more dynamic driving.
Volkswagen Bora engine produces 4 HP less power than Seat Toledo, whereas torque is 3 NM less than Seat Toledo. Due to the lower power, Volkswagen Bora reaches 100 km/h speed 1.1 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 7.56.9
Real fuel consumption: 8.1 l/100km7.5 l/100km
The Seat Toledo is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Volkswagen Bora consumes 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Seat Toledo, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Volkswagen Bora could require 90 litres more fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Volkswagen Bora consumes 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Seat Toledo.
Fuel tank capacity: 55 litres55 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 730 km in combined cycle790 km in combined cycle
940 km on highway1000 km on highway
670 km with real consumption730 km with real consumption
Seat Toledo gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Dimensions

Length: 4.38 m4.44 m
Width: 1.74 m1.74 m
Height: 1.45 m1.44 m
Both cars are similar in size. Volkswagen Bora is 6 cm shorter than the Seat Toledo, width is practically the same , while the height of Volkswagen Bora is 1 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 455 litresno data
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
785 litresno data
Turning diameter: 11 meters10.9 meters
The turning circle of the Volkswagen Bora is 0.1 metres more than that of the Seat Toledo.
Gross weight (kg): 1`7201`200
Safety: no datano data
Quality: no data
average
Average price (€): 12001400
Pros and Cons:
    Seat Toledo has
    • more dynamic
    • lower fuel consumption
    • more full fuel tank mileage
    Share these results to social networks or e-mail
    Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv