Volkswagen Bora 1998 vs Alfa Romeo 156 1997

 
Volkswagen Bora
1998 - 2000
Alfa Romeo 156
1997 - 2000
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 1.6 Petrol2.0 Petrol
Camshaft drive: Timing beltTiming belt

Performance

Power: 101 HP155 HP
Torque: 145 NM187 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 12 seconds8.6 seconds
Alfa Romeo 156 is a more dynamic driving.
Volkswagen Bora engine produces 54 HP less power than Alfa Romeo 156, whereas torque is 42 NM less than Alfa Romeo 156. Due to the lower power, Volkswagen Bora reaches 100 km/h speed 3.4 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 7.58.5
Real fuel consumption: 8.1 l/100km9.2 l/100km
The Volkswagen Bora is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Volkswagen Bora consumes 1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Alfa Romeo 156, which means that by driving the Volkswagen Bora over 15,000 km in a year you can save 150 litres of fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Volkswagen Bora consumes 1.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Alfa Romeo 156.
Fuel tank capacity: 55 litres63 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 730 km in combined cycle740 km in combined cycle
940 km on highway950 km on highway
670 km with real consumption680 km with real consumption

Engines

Average engine lifespan: 480'000 km290'000 km
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Volkswagen Bora engine could be longer.
Engine production duration: 14 years3 years
Engine spread: Used also on Volkswagen GolfInstalled on at least 4 other car models, including Alfa Romeo 166, Alfa Romeo 145, Alfa Romeo Spider
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts.

Dimensions

Length: 4.38 m4.43 m
Width: 1.74 m1.74 m
Height: 1.45 m1.42 m
Both cars are similar in size. Volkswagen Bora is 5 cm shorter than the Alfa Romeo 156, width is practically the same , while the height of Volkswagen Bora is 3 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 455 litres380 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
785 litresno data
Volkswagen Bora has more luggage capacity.
Even though the car is shorter, Volkswagen Bora has 75 litres more trunk space than the Alfa Romeo 156. The Alfa Romeo 156 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers.
Turning diameter: 11 meters11.1 meters
The turning circle of the Volkswagen Bora is 0.1 metres less than that of the Alfa Romeo 156.
Gross weight (kg): 1`7201`770
Safety: no datano data
Quality: no data
below average
Average price (€): 14001000
Rating in user reviews: 8.0/10 6.2/10
Pros and Cons: Volkswagen Bora has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • longer expected engine lifespan
  • roomier boot
  • higher ratings in user reviews
Alfa Romeo 156 has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv