Volkswagen Bora 1998 vs Volkswagen Passat 2000

 
Volkswagen Bora
1998 - 2001
Volkswagen Passat
2000 - 2005
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 1.4 Petrol1.6 Petrol

Performance

Power: 75 HP102 HP
Torque: 128 NM148 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 15 seconds13 seconds
Volkswagen Passat is a more dynamic driving.
Volkswagen Bora engine produces 27 HP less power than Volkswagen Passat, whereas torque is 20 NM less than Volkswagen Passat. Due to the lower power, Volkswagen Bora reaches 100 km/h speed 2 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 6.77.7
Real fuel consumption: 6.8 l/100km8.7 l/100km
The Volkswagen Bora is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Volkswagen Bora consumes 1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Passat, which means that by driving the Volkswagen Bora over 15,000 km in a year you can save 150 litres of fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Volkswagen Bora consumes 1.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Passat.
Fuel tank capacity: 55 litres62 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 820 km in combined cycle800 km in combined cycle
1010 km on highway1030 km on highway
800 km with real consumption710 km with real consumption

Dimensions

Length: 4.38 m4.70 m
Width: 1.74 m1.75 m
Height: 1.45 m1.46 m
Volkswagen Bora is smaller.
Volkswagen Bora is 32 cm shorter than the Volkswagen Passat, 1 cm narrower, while the height of Volkswagen Bora is 1 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 455 litres475 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
785 litresno data
Volkswagen Bora has 20 litres less trunk space than the Volkswagen Passat.
Turning diameter: 11 meters11 meters
Gross weight (kg): 1`7301`870
Safety: no data
Quality: no data
average
Average price (€): 14001400
Rating in user reviews: 8.0/10 7.9/10
Pros and Cons: Volkswagen Bora has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • lower price
Volkswagen Passat has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv