Volkswagen Bora 1999 vs Alfa Romeo 156 2003
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.9 Diesel | 2.4 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 115 HP | 175 HP | |
| Torque: | 285 NM | 385 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11 seconds | 8.6 seconds | |
|
Alfa Romeo 156 is a more dynamic driving. Volkswagen Bora engine produces 60 HP less power than Alfa Romeo 156, whereas torque is 100 NM less than Alfa Romeo 156. Due to the lower power, Volkswagen Bora reaches 100 km/h speed 2.4 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.3 | 6.7 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 5.9 l/100km | 6.9 l/100km | |
|
The Volkswagen Bora is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Volkswagen Bora consumes 1.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Alfa Romeo 156, which means that by driving the Volkswagen Bora over 15,000 km in a year you can save 210 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Volkswagen Bora consumes 1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Alfa Romeo 156. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 63 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1030 km in combined cycle | 940 km in combined cycle | |
| 1240 km on highway | 1140 km on highway | ||
| 930 km with real consumption | 910 km with real consumption | ||
| Volkswagen Bora gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Volkswagen Bora 1999 1.9 engine: The engine is very demanding when it comes to oil quality and using poor quality lubricants will significantly reduce engine life. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.41 m | 4.43 m | |
| Width: | 1.74 m | 1.74 m | |
| Height: | 1.47 m | 1.42 m | |
| Volkswagen Bora is 2 cm shorter than the Alfa Romeo 156, width is practically the same , while the height of Volkswagen Bora is 5 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 460 litres | 360 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1180 litres | |
|
Volkswagen Bora has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Volkswagen Bora has 100 litres more trunk space than the Alfa Romeo 156. The Alfa Romeo 156 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 11.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Volkswagen Bora is 0.6 metres less than that of the Alfa Romeo 156, which means Volkswagen Bora can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`880 | 1`895 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | low | |
| Average price (€): | 1400 | 1400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volkswagen Bora has
|
Alfa Romeo 156 has
| |