Volkswagen Bora 2002 vs Audi A3 2000

 
Volkswagen Bora
2002 - 2005
Audi A3
2000 - 2003
Body: Estate car / wagonHatchback
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 1.6 Petrol1.6 Petrol

Performance

Power: 110 HP102 HP
Torque: 155 NM148 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 11.7 seconds10.9 seconds
Volkswagen Bora engine produces 8 HP more power than Audi A3, whereas torque is 7 NM more than Audi A3. Despite the higher power, Volkswagen Bora reaches 100 km/h speed 0.8 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 6.36.8
The Volkswagen Bora is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
Volkswagen Bora consumes 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Audi A3, which means that by driving the Volkswagen Bora over 15,000 km in a year you can save 75 litres of fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 55 litres55 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 870 km in combined cycle800 km in combined cycle
1030 km on highway1030 km on highway
Volkswagen Bora gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Dimensions

Length: 4.41 m4.15 m
Width: 1.74 m1.74 m
Height: 1.47 m1.43 m
Volkswagen Bora is 26 cm longer than the Audi A3, width is practically the same , while the height of Volkswagen Bora is 4 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 460 litres350 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1470 litres1110 litres
Volkswagen Bora has more luggage capacity.
Volkswagen Bora has 110 litres more trunk space than the Audi A3. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Volkswagen Bora (by 360 litres).
Turning diameter: 11 meters10.9 meters
The turning circle of the Volkswagen Bora is 0.1 metres more than that of the Audi A3.
Gross weight (kg): 1`8401`650
Safety: no data
Quality: no data
above average
Average price (€): 16001600
Rating in user reviews: 8.0/10 7.3/10
Pros and Cons: Volkswagen Bora has
  • more power
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • roomier boot
  • higher ratings in user reviews
Audi A3 has
  • more dynamic
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv